Early property insurance policies, first introduced in seventeenth century England, insured against only a single peril: fire. That made sense at the time—most structures were wooden, making fire the most common risk of loss. Yet, in modern times with ever-changing and expanding risk profiles, fire is no longer the singular menace to property it once was.
Showing posts with label fires. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fires. Show all posts
Thursday, February 13, 2020
Thursday, November 15, 2018
California Wildfires and Related Insurance Claims Show No Signs of Stopping
“We can’t stop and we won’t stop.” Is this the refrain to a Miley Cyrus song, the creed of the thousands of firefighters currently battling California’s wildfires, or the mantra of the fires themselves? While any self-respecting Miley fan knows these are the lyrics to her hit “We Can’t Stop,” everyone who has seen the footage coming out of the California wildfires knows that the fires have been ferocious in their destruction, and the firefighters have been equally unrelenting in their efforts to contain them. Unfortunately, and fortunately, there is no wrong answer.
Labels:
California,
Camp fire,
fires,
wildfires,
Woolsey fire
Tuesday, May 8, 2018
Calif. Landslides Prompt 'Efficient Proximate Cause' Rehash
Mother Nature recently reminded California, as she often
does, of how cruel she can be. In December 2017, the state experienced its
largest wildfire in history.[1] The wildfire, known as the Thomas Fire, burned
more than 281,000 acres in Southern California and destroyed more than 1,000
structures.[2] A month later, California experienced its heaviest rainfall in
nearly a year.[3] Experts posit that the heavy rains, coupled with the absence
of vegetation from the fires, triggered catastrophic mudflows that killed 21
people and caused significant property damage to homes and infrastructure.[4]
Labels:
California,
fires,
landslides,
wildfires
Friday, April 13, 2018
The Boom Shift - Chemical Plant Explosion Claims and the Possible Adoption of Corporate Regulation Where Government Regulation is Absent
On the morning of March 15, 2018, a large explosion erupted
at the Tri-Chem Industries chemical plant in Cresson, Texas, approximately 25
miles southwest of Fort Worth. The explosion left
two workers badly injured and another presumed dead. According to 2017 Hood
County records of the company’s chemical inventory, it
has been reported that Tri-Chem’s Cresson plant stored chemicals that were
toxic, flammable and corrosive yet the company had no emergency response plans
in its files.
Labels:
chemical plant,
EPA,
explosion,
fires
Tuesday, February 27, 2018
Do Fires Cause Mudslides?
Most commercial and residential insurance policies contain
exclusions for earth movement, flood or surface water. At first glance it may
appear clear that these policies would not cover damage from a mudslide.
However, as the recent mudslides in Santa Barbara County, California demonstrate, the answer may not be so clear.
Those mudslides, which killed more than 20 people and damaged or destroyed
hundreds of homes, followed the Thomas Fire that scorched almost three hundred thousand acres.
Labels:
California,
fires,
mudslides
Friday, January 12, 2018
2017 – A Record Setting Year
2017 was a year of records for sure. Most notably, professional eater Joey Chestnut set a new record by eating 55 glazed doughnuts in eight minutes.[1] At a university in Ohio, 972 people set a record by dressing as penguins.[2] And, Ayanna Williams of Texas set a record thanks to her fingernails reaching a combined total length of 18 feet, 10.9 inches.[3] Unfortunately, the U.S. also set a record in 2017 with a total of $306 billion in damage resulting from several natural disasters. In fact, the 2017 season was the first time that three Category 4 hurricanes — Harvey, Irma, and Maria — made landfall in the United States and its territories in a one-year period.
Labels:
fires,
hail,
hurricane,
natural disasters,
wildfires
Tuesday, December 12, 2017
Sometimes CAT Insurance is Fun!
We noted this article in today’s New York Times, spotlighting FM Global’s Rhode Island research lab.
Labels:
climate change,
climate disasters,
fires,
hurricane
Friday, December 9, 2016
A Recipe for Disaster
Since November 23, 2016, the Chimney Tops and Cobbly Nob fires
have wreaked havoc on Sevier County, Tennessee. These fires have burned through an
estimated 17,000 acres and 2,400 properties. This disaster has taken the lives of 14
people and reportedly injured another 175 people. Adding to the emotional devastation and
turmoil of this expansive threat, local authorities in Tennessee just announced
that the arson investigation led to the identification and detainment of two
juveniles whom they believe ignited the first blaze. While the news of the responsible parties for
this horrible fire may have been surprising to many, the breadth of destruction
that these fires left behind is not unexpected when examining basic facts
about fires in the United States. Wildfires,
along with their associated events (heat waves and drought), were responsible
for the third highest rate of losses in the U.S. in 2015.
From 1995 to 2014, fires accounted for 1.5% of insured catastrophe losses, totaling about $6.0 Billion. The majority of wildfire-related costs are suffered in the State of California.
While California has reported the largest amount
of estimated insured losses and number of wildfire-related incidents, other states have been
identified as wildfire prone states. All in all, in the U.S., about 38 states are
identified as wildfire risks.
The figures showing the
frequency, severity and cost of these fires will likely continue to rise. The risk of wildfires is likely to continue
to grow as temperatures rise, lengthening the fire season, and more people move
into steep forested areas once largely uninhabited. Additionally, there is the
human element. According to the U.S.
Department of Interior, as many as 90% of wildland fires in the United States
are caused by humans. The confluence of
causal factors is perfect kindling and a recipe for disaster.
Posted by Anaysa Gallardo Stutzman
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Man-Made Cats
“The
industrial world destroys nature not because it doesn’t love it but because it
is not afraid of it.”
- Mary Ruefle,
American Poet
Most of the
major catastrophes we read about, think about and worry about are natural
occurrences: hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, volcanic eruptions.
But man-made catastrophes do their own share of damage. When they strike,
they often grab their own share of attention. The 9/11 terrorist attack
stands as one of the largest insurance catastrophes in history – not to mention
its far more devastating human impact. But most man-made catastrophes
are smaller in scale compared to what mother nature can deliver. They can
also stay under the radar, without headlines, without clear cause and effect,
without a clearly defined impact. They can be harder to trace and harder
to quantify. When an earthquake strikes, the resulting damage is apparent
and the cause and effect are obvious. Not always so with man-made events.
Case in
point: in 2015, forest fires and resulting haze in Southeast Asia were
unusually widespread and extreme, and researchers this week released a study
finding an incredible death toll: “The forest
fire and haze disaster in Southeast Asia last year may have led to the
deaths of more than 100,000 people,” the
New York Times reported. “The vast majority of the cases were in Indonesia, where fires
were deliberately set to clear land for agriculture.” In 2015, the
Indonesian government claimed only 19 of its citizens had perished due
to the fires and haze. The report released this week finds a much higher
figure: 91,600 in Indonesia alone.
The study was published in Environmental
Research Letters. The study’s authors explained the root cause of the
fires in 2015 and the resulting impact on human life:
Across Indonesia, fires are frequently used to burn agricultural
residue, clear forest, or prepare land for plantations and smallholder farms. .
. . Fire emission levels are greatest from degraded peatlands,
especially in dry years (Marlier et
al 2015a, 2015b). In 2006, burning in industrial concessions
to clear land for oil palm and timber plantations accounted for ~40% of total
fire emissions in Sumatra and ~25% in Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo) (Marlier et al 2015c).
*
* *
The degraded peatlands that typically burn during such episodes
contain significant combustible organic material and so release large amounts
of fine particulate matter (PM2.5), the leading cause of global
pollution-related mortality (World Health Organization 2009, Lelieveld et
al 2015). As in previous episodes, the prevailing
winds in 2015 transported the smoke to densely populated areas across Indonesia
and the Malay Peninsula, including Singapore and Kuala Lumpur.
Did
most of us hear, in 2015, about the fires, the smoke, and the heavy presence of
deadly particulate matter in population centers in Southeast Asia? Did we
hear that deaths were mounting, in the tens of thousands and as many as a
hundred thousand? No. Nor, apparently, was that reality recognized
anywhere before the release of the study in Environmental Research
Letters.
Similarly,
the predictions of dire consequences for life and property as a result of
Climate Change relate not only to high profile catastrophic events – like
stronger and more frequent hurricanes – but to the more insidious long-term
effects, including slowly rising seas, widespread droughts, and extremes of
temperature, all of which cause death and damage that are not as visibly and
obviously connected to the “catastrophe.” But to the victims, the results
are just as final.
Posted by Dan Millea
Labels:
earthquakes,
fires,
floods,
hurricane,
pollution,
volcanic eruptions
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




